Click to close
Loading...
Cancel
Home
|
Contact
|
Register
|
Login
Find products and services
View eco friendly homes or list your own eco house
Information on sustainable living
Community chat
Buy eco products
Search Eco Articles
Search
Eco Information Articles
Eco Events
Eco News
Eco Blogs
Eco Resources
Keyword
(Optional)
Category
< All Categories >
At home / living
Building design, construction and renovations
Energy
Garden and outdoors
General / other
Real estate and property development
Transport / Vehicles
Travel / Accomodation / Tourism
Vehicles and transport
Waste management
Water
Web, internet and computers
< All Sub Categories>
Location
Your local matters
Visit
Local Me
to find your local and join the local conversation.
Eco Living Information
>
Eco News
Our homes, our egos, and our environment
Saturday, March 26, 2011
I think I’ve discovered the root cause of all our environmental ills. Okay, that might sound like an outrageous claim, but let me explain. The particular villain I blame for mankind’s relentless attack on the planets eco system is our Collective Ego.
The more I investigate, the more I see the fingerprints of this villain everywhere. Take for example the average New Zealand home. Not so long ago we were satisfied with a modest house, big enough to fit our family, the dog and a television. But somewhere along the line our egos became restless; we needed bigger, fancier houses. We wanted to outdo our neighbours – out-build them, out-furnish them and over-impress our dinner party guests.
A home for 3 people used to contain a living room, a bathroom, three bedrooms and perhaps a study taking up around 180m2. Now days, you look at the typical specification for a modern home and you see all kinds of features that were virtually unheard of in the not-so-distant past such as a home gym, media room and more bathrooms than there are residents, sprawling over a massive 600m2. We install more bedrooms, living rooms and other rooms than we’ll ever need.
These gratuitously oversized (obese?) homes produce a number of environmentally negative effects. Firstly, the cost of heating these homes is substantially more than a more modest abode. Given the cold New Zealand winters (especially in the South Island) we install energy guzzling heat pumps in the rooms to heat our excessive space. This of course puts strain on our electricity grid, driving the call to dam more rivers or build polluting coal powered plants. The resources needed to build these homes are significantly increased – more concrete, more metals, more wood and so on. This of course equates to more mining, more mono-cultured forestry and more waste.
Another down side is the shear space large houses take up on the section. Rather than having more room for vegetable gardens, trees and other nature we’re stuck with homes that push out at the all corners of a section.
So, back to the culprit; we’ve moved beyond our need to live in comfort and moved into the territory of wanting to impress our friends, family and neighbours. We’re striving to be like our ‘role models’, the insanely rich celebrities that inhabit 50 bedroom mansions they frequent a few times a year and for the most part sit idle, a giant waste of space. You only have to look around at some of the ‘mega rich’ in our own country to see them indulging in this egotistical fantasy. Large mansions being built on prime coastal land Auckland and elsewhere.
For the sake of the environment it’s time to change the goal posts. Imagine if our way of impressing the neighbour was to brag about how well insulated our house was, or how our new rainwater collection tank had halved our water usage for the month? Imagine if we strived to put in photovoltaic panels to offset our electricity rather than spend the money on a new room for the home gym we’ll never use? Imagine if having more room for a vege garden or another tree in our backyard was more important than spending exorbitant amounts of cash on designer furniture?
Article by
Carlin Archer
Your comments:
by ceepeetoo
27 Mar 11
, 9 replies :
Last Post
Sort by:
Oldest to newest
Newest to oldest
Subscribe to this forum thread
Author
Post
ceepeetoo
2 posts
EGO vs Knowledge
Posted 27 Mar 11 7:54 AM
Ordinarily I would wholeheartedly agree with Carlin on her claim that much of our attack on the environment is caused by our collective 'ego', but my experience suggests a contributing 'culprit'...a lack of appropriate 'knowledge'. As a building technologist I find that there is a pervasive ignorance about many subjects that we need to have a better understanding about if we are to collectively protect and maintain a healthy environment. For example presently I am studying the cost-benefits of using local sewerage treatment options instead of relaying on the Municipal waste water system, which in Christchurch's case, reliance on the latter has caused considerable inconvenience (for better or worse). How well do home owners know about the options? And what are the costs and benefits of the options? It would seem that in this case knowledge, rather than ego is more likely to determine whether a residential developer or new home builder is likely to affect the environment for better or worse. The question that arises from this view, is how does one provide such knowledge to the public? This is to me is the more interesting subject.
Reply to this post
Archie
2 posts
Re: EGO vs Knowledge
Posted 2 Apr 11 11:11 AM
One of the contributing problems to the lack of knowledge by home owners is that the building trades do little to raise the game. Quotes for insulation, for example, are always for achieving the Building Regs. which is a minimum requirement. If they took the opportunity to add a recommendation for a better standard that would at least get the customer thinking. Energy costs will be the subject of future inflation just as much as everything else and the extra cost of putting in more insulation beyond the level at which the grant applies would be less than getting it done separately in the future.
The insulation of all pipes carrying hot water from a newly fitted boiler in an older house is not in the regs. It makes sense but is not suggested to the customer. The trade needs to do more: after all, it makes good sense to expose themselves to possibility of doing more business!
Reply to this post
pr
191 posts
Re: EGO vs Knowledge
Posted 2 Apr 11 4:09 PM
"Energy costs will be the subject of future inflation"
Absolutely - if not more so.
If you think energy is expensive now give it a couple of years and see what the cost is going to be.
Insulate, insulate, insulate - should be every ones mantra
Reply to this post
scooby
3 posts
Re: EGO vs Knowledge
Posted 2 Apr 11 8:05 PM
I agree, one thing I often see in new houses is these huge living spaces that are like halls. We need to start designing spaces that are nice to be in instead of great cavernous areas that are difficult to heat, and not actually very nice to be in.
Reply to this post
LSARC
1 posts
Re: EGO vs Knowledge
Posted 7 Apr 11 9:34 AM
Hi Carlin - we call this "upsizing" of houses a "McMansion". It is a social disease, similar to obesity.
Reply to this post
pr
191 posts
Re: EGO vs Knowledge
Posted 7 Apr 11 10:24 AM
But not always?
We just completed a 380m2 house for 5 people (2+3kids) with an integral granny flat for mum, making 6 person household in total
Considering that her old place was a typical 1960's house and our new place far exceeds the building code requirements for insulation, has some passive solar elements and is designed for low energy use, then the reductions in energy use for heating, water, water consumption, waste disposal etc, will definitely offset the increase in house area compared to running two smaller houses. Then there is also the reduced fuel usage with not having to drive across town to take mum shopping or pickup/drop off the kids etc.
So in our case, building a large house is definitely the ECO option. I agree this may not be the case for 1 or two people rattling around in 400m2
Pete
Reply to this post
Ecobob.co.nz
291 posts
Re: EGO vs Knowledge
Posted 7 Apr 11 6:19 PM
Hi Pete,
I totally agree with you. It's more about how the space is used. For instance some people have a home office (like me) which saves using as much fossil fuels to commute etc. Also, having more people in one house, rather than fewer in more houses makes sense too (as in your case).
A well insulated 300m2 house will cost less to heat than a badly insulated 200m2 house, so that is an important factor too.
What I think is wrong is gratuitous waste of space, for example the McMansions with more rooms than will ever be used.
I think if we attach more importance to environmentally friendly features of a house, rather than to egotistical attachments that just say 'look how much money I have' then we'd be on the right track.
Reply to this post
nofear
94 posts
Re: EGO vs Knowledge
Posted 10 Apr 11 8:04 AM
Quote
"I think if we attach more importance to environmentally friendly features of a house, rather than to egotistical attachments that just say 'look how much money I have' then we'd be on the right track. "
I wholly agree and will add the following
Often it is the case of 'Look how much money I have borrowed and look how stupid I am to completely enslave myself and family in this way"
The idea of houses as status symbols and "keeping up with the Jones'es" is a product of our consumption society that is the first to disappear in dire economic or adverse environmental
circumstances.
You know your country is in trouble when your televison programming is saturated with home reno shows, hot property sales and auctions, landscape gardening and mortgage finance advice.
The Machine that is foreign banksters, Insurance companies, Govt, Real Estate, and local councils needs you! They all depend on high asset book values to make themselves look good and increase their bottom lines, so the more you work or borrow to increase the perceived value of your home the better off they are. And what do you get out of this? usually a bigger loan repayment, higher interest, increased property rates and higher sales fees. Gee what do I get out of this again?
Do we actually own the house or does the house, (along with /foreign banksters/ councils/govt) own us?
Perhaps more of us should be looking at the financial environmental impacts of housing.
Eco friendly and debt friendly should go hand in hand. The environmental cost of broken marriages, high stress and burn out over simple bricks and mortar is horrendous and so unecessary.
The best advice I can give is don't build ego friendly homes. The ego is not your friend. The ego is a spoilt brat that requires constant discipline.
I'm going o discipline mine by going compost toilets and will park up the old flusheroo which the ego will really hate as I make him take out the 20 litre (non smelly) bucket every week or so. I can't wait to teach that little bastard...
Reply to this post
Just do it
69 posts
Re: EGO vs Knowledge
Posted 10 Apr 11 10:10 AM
You are right when you talk of a 'consumption society', everyone wants more than the other person, this in turn cannot keep up with world wide resources dwindling eg oil.
The monetary system is the root of all evil and this is backed up by Jacque Fresco of
www.thevenusproject.com
who has a very interesting take on the things you mentioned nofear.
They are a little strange at first, but the more you hear this Jacque guy say the more it makes sense.
The movie 'Zeitgeist Moving Forward' is very very interesting and a must see!
If only Bob Parker had issued 20litre buckets and a sack of sawbust to everyone in need they could have all made compost and saved the rivers from pollution. Importing cem wc's is just.......
Reply to this post
nofear
94 posts
Re: EGO vs Knowledge
Posted 10 Apr 11 9:19 PM
Quote"If only Bob Parker had issued 20litre buckets and a sack of sawbust to everyone in need they could have all made compost and saved the rivers from pollution. Importing cem wc's is just......."
i agree 100%. It would have been faster and way cheaper as well. Gee ..everyone wins except the suppliers and importers of chemical toilets..
Imagine, like in Asian countries where your human waste is collected daily and paid for by the company which tendered to collect it. i.e not paid for by you the ratepayer via council rates!. Using the bucket and sawdust method would provide a wonderful source of compost if treated correctly.
Most of all river and sea polluution would be averted and maybe ,just maybe, we would not have toxic 'blooms" and threatened shellfsh...here in the Marlborough Sounds we have a mussel industry providing 100's of tonnes per day. It can all cease overnight if pollution gets in the way.
I too endorse Zeitgeist, as well as Melt Up, The Day the dollar died", and other free videos on
www.inflation.us
The God Delusion is another free movie well worth consideration as it is religion which is the tool used by the TPTP (the powers that be) to abort most of today's social revolutions such as in egypt and iran etc. In both of those countries I mentioned, each time a person arrived by plane from another country and began talk of religion, when the revolution in both cases started out as secular,socialist, seeking equality, independence, freedom from oppression and freedom from the capitalist imperialist empire. Absolutely nothing to do with religion.
I had to laugh a week or so back when the big protest march in the UK was labelled by one of our NZ puppet tv stations as an 'anti-capitalist protest" It was nothing of the sort. It was a protest directed against their government, but we can't tell the natives that...heck they might get ideas and do the same thing in NZ.
I reckon the NZ govt's greatest fear is that maori and non maori actually join forces. Now then we could really get great things done. In the meantime, everything possible is done to keep us apart and divided.
I look forward to visiting the venus project. Thanks very much for the link.
Reply to this post
10 results found
Share this page
Home
|
About
|
Contact
|
Advertise
|
Local Me (NZ)
& Local Me (ZA)
|
Developed by Carlin Archer
of Redweb
© Copyright 2013 Ecobob Ltd